Active & passive fund management: What’s the difference? (2024)

FAQs

Active & passive fund management: What’s the difference? ›

In general terms, active management refers to mutual funds that are actively managed by a portfolio manager. Passive management typically refers to funds that simply mirror the composition and performance of a specific index, such as the Standard & Poor's 500^® Index.

Active management requires frequent buying and selling in an effort to outperform a specific benchmark or index. Passive management replicates a specific benchmark or index in order to match its performance. Active management portfolios strive for superior returns but take greater risks and entail larger fees.

Because active investing is generally more expensive (you need to pay research analysts and portfolio managers, as well as additional costs due to more frequent trading), many active managers fail to beat the index after accounting for expenses—consequently, passive investing has often outperformed active because of ...

Actively managed investments tend to generate higher returns since they take on more risk. Passively managed investments have an average and stable return. Costs are high for active management strategies because the level of order placement is relatively frequent.

Active funds strive for higher returns and may provide better capital protection in turbulent markets but they come with higher costs and risks. Passive funds offer steady, long-term returns at lower costs but carry market-level risks.

Passively managed funds include passive index funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and Fund of funds investing in ETFs. These funds follow a benchmark and aim to deliver returns in tandem with the benchmark, subject to expense ratio and tracking error.

As the ETF market has evolved, different types of ETFs have been developed. They can be passively managed or actively managed. Passively managed ETFs attempt to closely track a benchmark (such as a broad stock market index, like the S&P 500), whereas actively managed ETFs intend to outperform a benchmark.

Passive investing targets strong returns in the long term by minimizing the amount of buying and selling, but it is unlikely to beat the market and result in outsized returns in the short term. Active investment can bring those bigger returns, but it also comes with greater risks than passive investment.

Among the benefits they see: Flexibility – because active managers, unlike passive ones, are not required to hold specific stocks or bonds. Hedging – the ability to use short sales, put options, and other strategies to insure against losses.

Disadvantages of Active Management

Actively managed funds generally have higher fees and are less tax-efficient than passively managed funds. The investor is paying for the sustained efforts of investment advisers who specialize in active investment, and for the potential for higher returns than the markets as a whole.

Why do some investors prefer passive portfolio management? ›

Some investors prefer passive portfolio management due to its simplicity, lower costs, and long-term focus.

Investors looking to outperform the market may opt for an actively managed portfolio, while long-term investors may prefer a passive management approach. Investing your money in stocks, bonds and other assets can grow your wealth much quicker than leaving it in your bank account.

Additionally, active managers may be more likely to take on more risk than passive managers. The main disadvantage of active management is the higher costs associated with the research and analysis required to generate alpha. Active managers must also overcome the increased risk of making errors in their decisions.

Active investments are funds run by investment managers who try to outperform an index over time, such as the S&P 500 or the Russell 2000. Passive investments are funds intended to match, not beat, the performance of an index.

Passive investors hold assets long term, which means paying less in taxes. Lower Risk: Passive investing can lower risk, because you're investing in a broad mix of asset classes and industries, as opposed to relying on the performance of individual stock.

An influential study[3] which used the concept of Active Share to assess returns over a 20-year period, found that the most active managers outperformed their benchmarks by 1.3 percent annually after fees whereas “closet indexers” unsurprisingly performed worst, lagging the benchmark by around 0.9 percent a year.

When things go well, actively managed funds can deliver performance that beats the market over time, even after their fees are paid. But investors should keep in mind that there's no guarantee an active fund will be able to deliver index-beating performance, and many don't.

Only one out of every four active funds topped the average of their passive rivals over the 10-year period ended December 2022. But success rates vary across categories. Long-term success rates were generally higher among bond, real estate, and foreign-stock funds, where active management may hold the upper hand.

In general, actively managed funds have failed to survive and beat their benchmarks, especially over longer time horizons. Just one out of every four active funds topped the average of passive rivals over the 10-year period ended June 2023. But success rates vary across categories.